Heriberto Rodriguez v. County of Los Angeles, 891 F.3d 776 (2018)

Citation: Heriberto Rodriguez v. County of Los Angeles, 891 F.3d 776 (2018)
Parent Document: Heriberto Rodriguez v. County of Los Angeles, 891 F.3d 776 (2018)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2018-05-30
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4502306/heriberto-rodriguez-v-county-of... ↗

Full Text

580 chars

Deputies Sanford, Vazquez, and Delgado argue that limits
on the proper use of tasers were still unclear as of 2008,
relying on two Fourth Amendment cases decided after the
cell extractions at issue in this case: Mattos v. Agarano,
661 F.3d 433 (9th Cir. 2011) (en banc), and Bryan v.
MacPherson, 630 F.3d 805 (9th Cir. 2010). Mattos and
Bryan clarified the circumstances under which taser use
would violate the Fourth Amendment and granted qualified
immunity to the officers who acted without the benefit of this
clarification. See Mattos, 661 F.3d at 448; Bryan, 630 F.3d
at 833.

Other Sections in This Document (185)

Full Text