Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Citation
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Parent Document
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 1992-01-24
Other Sections in This Document (42)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
- Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)
Full Text
690 charsThe FmHA now challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment, arguing that the Agency’s action satisfied the rigors of the arbitrary-and-capricious standard applicable to administrative actions. See 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A) (1988). Joining with the view adopted by the First Circuit in reviewing this regulation, we agree, concluding for the reasons set forth below that the FmHA action was neither contrary to law nor arbitrary and capricious. See Brewer v. Madigan, 945 F.2d 449 (1st Cir.1991).4 We therefore find that the challenged regulation was properly promulgated and direct the district court to enter judgment in favor of the appellants. II. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review