Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Ernest Brown v. Philadelphia Housing Authority, 350 F.3d 338 (2003)

Citation
Ernest Brown v. Philadelphia Housing Authority, 350 F.3d 338 (2003)
Parent Document
Ernest Brown v. Philadelphia Housing Authority, 350 F.3d 338 (2003)
Effective Date
2003-11-19

Other Sections in This Document (58)

Full Text

546 chars
36
Subject-matter jurisdiction, then, is an Art. III as well as a statutory requirement; it functions as a restriction on federal power, and contributes to the characterization of the federal sovereign. Certain legal consequences directly follow from this. For example, no action of the parties can confer subject-matter jurisdiction upon a federal court. Thus, the consent of the parties is irrelevant, principles of estoppel do not apply, and a party does not waive the requirement by failing to challenge jurisdiction early in the proceedings.