Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Ernest Brown v. Philadelphia Housing Authority, 350 F.3d 338 (2003)

Citation
Ernest Brown v. Philadelphia Housing Authority, 350 F.3d 338 (2003)
Parent Document
Ernest Brown v. Philadelphia Housing Authority, 350 F.3d 338 (2003)
Effective Date
2003-11-19

Other Sections in This Document (58)

Full Text

472 chars
27
To us, these are distinctions without differences. The First Circuit in Navarro-Ayala failed to heed the Supreme Court's pointed indication in Spangler that where a class was not certified by the district court and the named plaintiff had lost his stake in the outcome of the litigation, the case is moot. Moreover, as PHA contends and as we agree, Navarro-Ayala is inapposite because mootness was not at issue there, as it is here. Thus, Navarro-Ayala is unpersuasive.