Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)

Citation
Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
Parent Document
Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
Effective Date
1984-01-30

Other Sections in This Document (109)

Full Text

797 chars
60
Instructed by Mandell v. Bradley, 432 U.S. 173, 176-77, 97 S.Ct. 2238, 2240-41, 53 L.Ed.2d 199 (1977) (per curiam), we have examined the jurisdictional statement filed in Fresh Pond Shopping Center, Inc., from which it appears that virtually the same taking issue was presented to the Court as is presented here. That question is whether the creation by state law of statutory tenancies after expiration of the tenants' leases amounts to a taking for which the state must provide compensation. The summary disposition of the appeal in Fresh Pond Shopping Center, Inc. binds this court. See Hicks v. Miranda, 422 U.S. 332, 343-45, 95 S.Ct. 2281, 2288-90, 45 L.Ed.2d 223 (1975). We hold, therefore, that the Tenancy Act constitutes neither a "permanent physical occupation" nor a "public use." V.