Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)

Citation
Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
Parent Document
Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
Effective Date
1984-01-30

Other Sections in This Document (109)

Full Text

806 chars
21
At the time plaintiffs filed this complaint, the tenant-defendants had not obtained court orders declaring that they qualified for protected tenancy status. Arguing that the district court should not proceed without such a determination, the tenant-defendants filed a motion for abstention on April 10, 1982. The district court denied that motion on April 26. On May 25, Troy and East Coast moved to add the four individual investor-plaintiffs--King, Snyder, Weinberg, and Forman--and moved for partial summary judgment on due process, equal protection, and taking grounds. The state-defendants cross-moved for summary judgment on July 6. The tenant-defendants also filed a cross-motion for summary judgment seeking to dismiss the complaint "insofar as it alleges that [section 14] is unconstitutional."