Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Citation
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Parent Document
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 1983-05-12
Other Sections in This Document (51)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
- Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)
Full Text
741 chars38
HUD's second reason was that the "public interest" lay in immediate implementation of the rent increase. If such a conclusory statement were accepted as establishing an exception to the public comment rule, however, it would "swallow the rule." Mobil Oil v. Department of Energy, 610 F.2d 796, 803 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 937, 100 S.Ct. 2156, 64 L.Ed.2d 790 (1980). HUD was in no position to proclaim the need for expedition when it had itself dragged its feet for seven months to produce an extremely simple rule. See Consumers Union v. Sawhill, 393 F.Supp. 639, 641 (D.D.C.) ("[A]ny emergency which existed necessitating immediate [action] was created by the agency itself."), affd., 523 F.2d 1404 (Em.App.1975).