Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)

Citation
Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
Parent Document
Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
Effective Date
1986-04-21

Other Sections in This Document (44)

Full Text

794 chars
3
Strictly speaking, the requirements of Sec. 21 limit the DDA's authority to approve a renewal project. The fact that the DDA would not have the authority to begin the renewal project until it followed the procedures of Sec. 21 leads us to the conclusion that it lacked the authority to evict tenants in furtherance of the renewal project in the absence of compliance with Sec. 21. We do not address the effect of failure to comply with Sec. 21 on the validity of other actions taken by the DDA, such as condemnation. We hold only that residents of a renewal area are entitled to remain free from displacement by a DDA renewal project unless and until the DDA has followed the requirements of the DDA Act, including the adequate relocation requirement, or to be compensated for their interests