Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Citation
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Parent Document
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 1986-04-21
Other Sections in This Document (44)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
- Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
Full Text
775 chars6 The issues raised on appeal are (1) whether continued occupancy as tenant at will is a property interest protected by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments from uncompensated taking by the DDA; (2) whether appellants claim that they were deprived of property without due process of law when they were displaced by the DDA without the statutorily required assurance of adequate alternative accommodations states a claim under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983; (3) whether appellants claim that they were denied equal protection of the law when they were displaced without the assurance of adequate alternative accommodations accorded by the DDA to others similarly situated states a claim under Sec. 1983; and (4) whether the district court properly dismissed appellants' state law claims.