Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Zephier v. Pierce, 714 F.2d 856 (1983)

Citation
Zephier v. Pierce, 714 F.2d 856 (1983)
Parent Document
Zephier v. Pierce, 714 F.2d 856 (1983)
Effective Date
1983-08-19

Full Text

687 chars
14
Nevertheless, by the time the district court considered Zephier's motion for a preliminary injunction, Zephier's counsel had spoken with the Hedquists, who indicated that they were "ready and willing to comply with any due process hearing or procedure that is established in order to be able to evict Myrna Zephier." The Hedquists further stated that they intended to evict Zephier only "as soon as the procedures for doing so are clarified." Supplemental Affidavit of Dara L. Schur in Support of Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, pp 3, 4 (May 22, 1981) (emphasis added). See Supplemental Affidavit of Dara L. Schur in Response to Defendant's Objections pp 4, 5, 7 (June 16, 1981).