Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Zephier v. Pierce, 714 F.2d 856 (1983)

Citation
Zephier v. Pierce, 714 F.2d 856 (1983)
Parent Document
Zephier v. Pierce, 714 F.2d 856 (1983)
Effective Date
1983-08-19

Full Text

512 chars
5
On April 29, 1981, the MHRA wrote the Hedquists, informing them that because the MHRA did not receive their notice until March 20, 1981, the MHRA's procedures were not followed, and the notice was invalid. The Hedquists took no further action. On May 5, 1981, Zephier instituted the present suit, alleging that the regulations concerning the termination of Section 8 tenancies, particularly 24 C.F.R. § 882.215, were contrary to federal statute and to the due process clause of the United States Constitution.2