Nelson Walker, and Fair Housing Foundation of Long Beach, Counter-Claimant-Appellant v. City of Lakewood, a California Municipality, 272 F.3d 1114 (2001)

Citation: Nelson Walker, and Fair Housing Foundation of Long Beach, Counter-Claimant-Appellant v. City of Lakewood, a California Municipality, 272 F.3d 1114 (2001)
Parent Document: Nelson Walker, and Fair Housing Foundation of Long Beach, Counter-Claimant-Appellant v. City of Lakewood, a California Municipality, 272 F.3d 1114 (2001)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2001-11-01
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/775731/nelson-walker-and-fair-housing-f... ↗

Full Text

636 chars

Viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the FHF, the organization has also shown that it suffered an adverse action. In the context of a § 3617 claim, that adverse action must be in the form of “coercion], intimidation], threat[s], or interfere[nce].” 42 U.S.C. § 3617. FHF has not sought to distinguish among these statutory terms, nor does the statute provide any definition. In determining what those terms mean, “we look first to the plain language of the statute, construing the provisions of the entire law, including its object and policy, to ascertain the intent of Congress.” Northwest Forest Res. Council v. Glickman,

Other Sections in This Document (160)

Full Text