Farrell v. Cassano, 34 F. App'x 11 (2002)
- Citation
- Farrell v. Cassano, 34 F. App'x 11 (2002)
- Parent Document
- Farrell v. Cassano, 34 F. App'x 11 (2002)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 2002-04-29
Other Sections in This Document (15)
- Farrell v. Cassano, 34 F. App'x 11 (2002)
- Farrell v. Cassano, 34 F. App'x 11 (2002)
- Farrell v. Cassano, 34 F. App'x 11 (2002)
- Farrell v. Cassano, 34 F. App'x 11 (2002)
- Farrell v. Cassano, 34 F. App'x 11 (2002)
- Farrell v. Cassano, 34 F. App'x 11 (2002)
- Farrell v. Cassano, 34 F. App'x 11 (2002)
- Farrell v. Cassano, 34 F. App'x 11 (2002)
- Farrell v. Cassano, 34 F. App'x 11 (2002)
- Farrell v. Cassano, 34 F. App'x 11 (2002)
- Farrell v. Cassano, 34 F. App'x 11 (2002)
- Farrell v. Cassano, 34 F. App'x 11 (2002)
- Farrell v. Cassano, 34 F. App'x 11 (2002)
- Farrell v. Cassano, 34 F. App'x 11 (2002)
- Farrell v. Cassano, 34 F. App'x 11 (2002)
Full Text
700 charsFarrell began renting the basement apartment in a two-family dwelling in Brooklyn from Rose Desimini on a month-to-month basis in May 1993. In May 1994, Rose Desimini transferred ownership of her house to her children, defendants Madeline Cassano and Pasquale Desimini (the “Owners”). The children placed the property up for sale in November 1999. After the property was put up for sale, Pasquale Desimini (“Desimini”) states he told Farrell to begin looking for a new apartment because the property was being sold. Farrell alleges that a couple, an American wife and European husband, who were interested in letting Farrell remain as a tenant made an offer on the property which the Owners rejected.