Greg Moore v. Sean Garnand, 83 F.4th 743 (2023)

Citation: Greg Moore v. Sean Garnand, 83 F.4th 743 (2023)
Parent Document: Greg Moore v. Sean Garnand, 83 F.4th 743 (2023)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2023-09-29
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/9429207/greg-moore-v-sean-garnand/ ↗

Full Text

948 chars

7
  Because the district court denied Defendants’ summary judgment
motion, Miller v. Gammie, 335 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc)
(holding that the court lacked jurisdiction over an order that “did not
expressly deny the motion” but “deferred ruling on immunity”), and
Moss v. U.S. Secret Service, 572 F.3d 962, 972–73 (9th Cir. 2009)
(holding that the court lacked jurisdiction over the district court’s
deferral of the summary judgment motion), do not control. Miller and
Moss are further distinguishable because here, the district court’s order
subjected Defendants to discovery without limitation. See Miller, 335
F.3d at 892 (explaining that the order “deferred a ruling, pending limited
discovery” (emphasis added)); Moss, 572 F.3d at 973 (explaining that
“the district court ha[d] yet to order any discovery or to compel the
Agents to submit to depositions”).
                          MOORE V. GARNAND                             11

Other Sections in This Document (42)

Full Text