Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Greg Moore v. Sean Garnand, 83 F.4th 743 (2023)

Citation
Greg Moore v. Sean Garnand, 83 F.4th 743 (2023)
Parent Document
Greg Moore v. Sean Garnand, 83 F.4th 743 (2023)
Effective Date
2023-09-29

Other Sections in This Document (42)

Full Text

1,189 chars
immunity to the burdens of discovery the officers might
possess.” Id.; see also Behrens v. Pelletier, 516 U.S. 299,
308 (1996) (holding that qualified immunity gives
government officials a right “not merely to avoid standing
trial, but also to avoid the burdens of such pretrial matters as
discovery” (internal quotation marks and emphasis omitted)
(quoting Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 526 (1985)));
Moss v. U.S. Secret Serv., 572 F.3d 962, 973 (9th Cir. 2009)
(“[A]n order clearing the way for burdensome pre-trial
discovery obligations renders the denial of immunity
effectively unreviewable on appeal from final judgment—
immunity from suit is of no use at that late stage.”).
    Under Ganwich, we have jurisdiction to consider purely
legal qualified immunity questions when, as here, the district
court denies the qualified immunity motion (thereby forcing
defendants to undergo burdensome discovery) but leaves the
issue open for reconsideration.7
    Plaintiffs contend that Ganwich is distinguishable
because it did not involve a denial of qualified immunity
based on the district court’s perceived need for further
discovery. Under the circumstances, we do not view this as