Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Auday Maki and Salwa Atwan v. William Laakko, Beverly Laakko and Liisa Laakko, 88 F.3d 361 (1996)

Citation
Auday Maki and Salwa Atwan v. William Laakko, Beverly Laakko and Liisa Laakko, 88 F.3d 361 (1996)
Parent Document
Auday Maki and Salwa Atwan v. William Laakko, Beverly Laakko and Liisa Laakko, 88 F.3d 361 (1996)
Effective Date
1996-08-12

Other Sections in This Document (61)

Full Text

828 chars
Plaintiffs’ Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, pp. 4-5 filed June 27, 1994 ("Safranek informed Mr. Drew that this was not his understanding”); Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, p. 1, n. 1 filed July 15, 1994 ("Attorney is prepared to file an affidavit contradicting Michael Drew’s affidavit”); Appellants' Brief at 10 ("Attorney was called about this letter and told that no such date was agreed upon,” citing the June 27 Brief); Appellants’ Reply Brief at 2 ("Appellees specifically denied this alleged fact,” citing the July 15 Response). However, this is all wind-up and no pitch. In the absence of opposing affidavits, the Drew affidavit remains uncontroverted.