Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Auday Maki and Salwa Atwan v. William Laakko, Beverly Laakko and Liisa Laakko, 88 F.3d 361 (1996)

Citation
Auday Maki and Salwa Atwan v. William Laakko, Beverly Laakko and Liisa Laakko, 88 F.3d 361 (1996)
Parent Document
Auday Maki and Salwa Atwan v. William Laakko, Beverly Laakko and Liisa Laakko, 88 F.3d 361 (1996)
Effective Date
1996-08-12

Other Sections in This Document (61)

Full Text

539 chars
was due to the treatment they started to receive at the hands of the Appellees around June 1,1998.” Appellants’ Reply Brief at 12. The fact that the Makis wanted to leave and were looking for another apartment, coupled with the un-eontested affidavit of Attorney Michael Drew that he drew up the notice to quit tenancy as a compromise to allow the Makis sufficient time to move and yet assure the Laakkos of a date when the apartment would be open for new tenants convinces us that the Makis’ claim that they were evicted is unsupported. 1