Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Mary Valencia v. City of Springfield, 883 F.3d 959 (2018)

Citation
Mary Valencia v. City of Springfield, 883 F.3d 959 (2018)
Parent Document
Mary Valencia v. City of Springfield, 883 F.3d 959 (2018)
Effective Date
2018-03-01

Other Sections in This Document (36)

Full Text

857 chars
such time as it may take to determine whether the suit is, or is not, meri-
torious.” Id. “The propriety of preliminary relief and resolution of the mer-
its are … ‘significantly different’ issues,” Parents Involved in Cmty. Sch. v.
Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1, 551 U.S. 701, 721 n.10 (2007) (quoting Univ. of Tex.
v. Camenisch, 451 U.S. 390, 393 (1981)), and therefore “findings made at the
preliminary injunction stage do not bind the district court as the case pro-
gresses.” Michigan v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, 667 F.3d 765, 782 (7th Cir.
2011).
    9 As stated above, the requirements for reasonable accommodation
under the FHAA are the same as those under the ADA and Rehabilitation
Act. See Oconomowoc, 300 F.3d at 783; Gile v. United Airlines, Inc., 95 F.3d
492, 497 (7th Cir. 1996).
14                                                   No. 17-2773