Francis v. Kings Park Manor, Inc., 944 F.3d 370 (2019)

Citation: Francis v. Kings Park Manor, Inc., 944 F.3d 370 (2019)
Parent Document: Francis v. Kings Park Manor, Inc., 944 F.3d 370 (2019)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2019-12-06
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4684833/francis-v-kings-park-manor-inc/ ↗

Full Text

892 chars

6Some scholarship on the subject confirms that § 3604(b) and § 3617 encompass post‐
     acquisition claims. See generally Robert G. Schwemm, Neighbor‐on‐Neighbor
     Harassment: Does the Fair Housing Act Make a Federal Case out of It?, 61 CASE W. RES.
     L. REV. 865 (2011); Mary Pennisi, A Herculean Leap for the Hard Case of Post‐
     Acquisition Claims: Interpreting Fair Housing Act Section 3604(b) After Modesto, 37
     FORDHAM URB. L.J. 1083 (2010); Rigel C. Oliveri, Is Acquisition Everything? Protecting
     the Rights of Occupants Under the Fair Housing Act, 43 HARV. C.R.‐C.L. L. REV. 1
     (2008); Robert G. Schwemm, Cox, Halprin, and Discriminatory Municipal Services
     Under the Fair Housing Act, 41 IND. L. REV. 717 (2008).
                                               15
 1   considered the services provision of § 3604 to apply throughout a person’s 2   tenancy.

Other Sections in This Document (882)

Full Text