Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)
- Citation
- Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)
- Parent Document
- Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 2013-01-24
Other Sections in This Document (9)
- Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)
- Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)
- Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)
- Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)
- Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)
- Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)
- Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)
- Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)
- Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)
Full Text
793 charsAfter these events transpired, Williams signed a new lease with Carriage House. One of the clauses states: “The Tenant agrees to permit the Landlord, his/her agents or other persons, when authorized by the Landlord, to enter the unit for the purpose of making reasonable repairs and periodic inspections.” In accordance with the clause, on July 9, 2008, Carriage House notified Williams of an upcoming inspection five days later. The notice listed the correct date of the inspection (July 14) but incorrectly identified the day of the week as Wednesday instead of Monday. The Carriage House property manager and an agent from United States Housing and Urban Development inspected Williams’s apartment as planned on July 14. Williams was not present; four of her minor children were home alone.