Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)
- Citation
- Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)
- Parent Document
- Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 2013-01-24
Other Sections in This Document (9)
- Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)
- Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)
- Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)
- Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)
- Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)
- Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)
- Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)
- Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)
- Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)
Full Text
591 charsAngela Williams, a resident of subsidized housing in Indianapolis, Indiana, contends that her apartment manager, its parent company, a private security company, and a security guard, violated her rights under state and federal law by arresting her, initiating eviction proceedings against her, and inspecting her home when she was not present. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants. Because the facts in the record, which we construe in Williams’s favor, see Padula v. Leimbach, 656 F.3d 595, 600 (7th Cir.2011), establish no legal violations, we affirm the judgment.