Section 888

Citation: Section 888
Parent Document: Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2017-12-23
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7328080/open-cmtys-alliance-v-carson/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (99)

Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888
Section 888

Full Text

361 chars

Finally, the defendants invoke the Auer doctrine to argue that their construction of the regulation is due deference even if the regulation's meaning is not clear. Defs.' Opp'n at 25-26. As explained in detail above, however, the defendants' construction is "inconsistent with the regulation," Press Commc'ns LLC , 875 F.3d at 1121, and thus due no deference.10