Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Citation
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Parent Document
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 2017-12-23
Other Sections in This Document (99)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
- Section 888
Full Text
1,780 charsThe Suspension Memo identified "several findings" in the Interim Report "that are worrisome and where further research is needed to address a number of critical questions with respect to the potential harm to HCV families (both participants and applicants) in areas transitioning to Small Area FMRs." Id. at 5. "[F]indings of the interim report that are of most concern to HUD," the Suspension Memo stated, "relate to the availability of units and the impact of Small Area FMRs on voucher success rates and utilization, and to rent burdens among assisted households." Id. Specifically, the Suspension Memo stated that "[o]ne of the findings of concern from the interim report is that the gain in units with rents below the applicable FMR in high-rent ZIP codes did not offset the decrease in the number of units in the low-rent and moderate-rent ZIP codes." Id. The Suspension Memo acknowledged that, by contrast to the operation of SAFMRs in the pilot PHAs, the Rule capped any SAFMR decrease to 10 percent per year, but concluded that this provision "may only slow the pace of the loss of units, as opposed to preventing the overall decline in the number of units available to HCV families in the metropolitan area." Id. at 5-6. The Suspension Memo also recounted the Interim Report's findings that SAFMRs have potential to increase voucher holders' rent burdens. Id. at 6. The Suspension Memo again acknowledged that, by contrast to the operation of SAFMRs in the pilot PHAs, the Rule allows PHAs to hold nonmoving families harmless from payment standard amount decreases, but noted that "there is no protection for families that must move to a new unit or for applicant families off the waiting list who are trying to lease a unit on the program for the first time." Id. at 7.