(a) Any of the specific security measures recommended in the crime prevention survey are unnecessary to meet security needs at the particular development;
(b) Within the fiscal or contracting constraints that apply to the particular development, the landlord’s proposed plan will provide a reasonable method or timetable for meeting security needs; or
(c) The costs required to undertake the improvements mandated by the crime prevention survey as such as to make a security plan cost-prohibitive, the Commissioner shall either approve the petition for a modified security plan or make such modifications to the plan as are necessary.
(5) In ruling on a petition where it is claimed that a security plan is cost-prohibitive, the Commissioner shall be guided by the principle, consistent with the security objectives articulated in the crime prevention survey, that the impact on tenants’ rents should be minimized so that the cost of additional security measures will not have the likely effect of displacing elderly/handicapped tenants due to the excessive rent increases. In such cases, the Commissioner shall consider reasonable alternatives to the security measures called for by the crime prevention survey.
(6) In reviewing the adequacy of the plan and reaching a decision thereon, the Commissioner shall consult with the Boston Police Department, as provided for in Subsection 11-1.7 as amended. Such approval or modification shall be in the form of a written decision, and shall be furnished to all affected parties within ten days of the hearing date.
(C) Tenant participation requirements in conjunction with submission of security plans.