(1) Within 30 days of receipt of the crime prevention survey, if the landlord of an elderly/handicapped multi-family development disputes the need for any of the specific security measures recommended by the crime prevention survey, or the method or the timetable for carrying out security measures, based on the fiscal or contracting constraints that apply to the particular development, or if the landlord and/or tenants of an elderly/handicapped multi-family development believes that the additional security measures mandated by the crime prevention survey are such as to be cost-prohibitive, given the economic circumstances of the tenants of the development and the inability of the landlord and/or the tenants to obtain sufficient funding, equipment or services to cover the costs of such additional measures despite best efforts, as provided for in Subsection 9-11.5, then the landlord and/or tenants can petition the Commissioner of the Inspectional Services Department for permission to submit a modified security plan which does not encompass all of the security measures mandated by the crime prevention survey. Such petition shall be accompanied by a proposed security plan. A landlord may only claim that the elements mandated by the crime prevention survey are cost-prohibitive if the increased costs must be passed along to the tenants of the development and absorbed by the tenants in the tenants’ share of the rent. In all cases under this Subsection, the tenants must be given the opportunity to present their views to the Commissioner of the Inspectional Services Department at a hearing before the petition and plan is accepted.