Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Citation
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Parent Document
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 2001-01-23
Other Sections in This Document (18)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
Full Text
807 charsThe Bank moved for summary judgment on its unlawful detainer claim, setting forth, along with a supporting affidavit, copies of the pertinent documents and the facts related to the foreclosure sale and the demand for possession. The Bank also moved the court for an order striking the Mikas’ affirmative defenses. The court granted the order striking the affirmative defenses. The court subsequently granted the Bank’s motion for summary judgment as to the claim for restitution of the premises and denied the motion for summary judgment with regard to the claim for damages for wrongfully holding over. After a trial on the issue of damages, the trial court allowed the Bank a judgment in the amount of $63,285.44, plus further damage in the amount of $7,000.00 per month until restitution is made. Point I