Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Citation
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Parent Document
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 2001-01-23
Other Sections in This Document (18)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
- Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika, 36 S.W.3d 772 (2001)
Full Text
579 charsThe Mikas remained in possession of the property following the sale. The Bank provided formal notice of the foreclosure on July 20, 1999, and demanded immediate surrender of possession of the property. On July 27, 1999, the bank filed an action in unlawful detainer to cause the removal of the Mikas from the property. The Mi-kas filed an answer denying that the bank was entitled to possession of the property, and pleading certain counterclaims, including: 1) fraud for inducing the Mikas to allow the property to be foreclosed and to allow the loss of their redemption rights;