Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)

Citation: Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Parent Document: Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Jurisdiction: Missouri (state)
Effective Date: 1996-05-28
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1758627/mark-vii-inc-v-barthol/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (39)

Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)

Full Text

213 chars

Though the rule has not been restated for quite some time, its precedential value has not diminished. Because we find the reasons behind the hen requirement are equally vahd today, we reaffirm the holding of Dano.