Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)

Citation
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Parent Document
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
1996-05-28

Other Sections in This Document (39)

Full Text

679 chars
Appellants appeal from an order sustaining respondent’s motion to dismiss appellants’ claim for civil conspiracy under Mo. Rule 55.27(a)(6). Appellants assert on appeal that the trial court erred in dismissing Count IV of appellants’ Second Amended Petition for Damages as against respondent because: 1) appellants do not have to ahege that respondent interfered with a hen before they can maintain a claim for civil conspiracy against respondent as found by the court; and, 2) appellants’ Second Amended Petition for Damages sets forth the elements necessary to state a cause of action for civil conspiracy against respondent with the specificity required by Missouri law. FACTS