Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Centerline Investment Co. v. Tri-Cor Industries, Inc., 80 S.W.3d 499 (2002)

Citation
Centerline Investment Co. v. Tri-Cor Industries, Inc., 80 S.W.3d 499 (2002)
Parent Document
Centerline Investment Co. v. Tri-Cor Industries, Inc., 80 S.W.3d 499 (2002)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
2002-07-23

Other Sections in This Document (31)

Full Text

886 chars
. There are only two points in the petition where the landlord might be thought to suggest that it was seeking to recover real estate commissions. The first is in paragraph 6 of *506its petition, where it says merely: "Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Lease, specifically Article 12, if Defendant defaults on any provision of the Lease, it is obligated to pay outstanding rent due, all of Plaintiff's expenses associated with reletting the premises and all costs of collection including Plaintiff's reasonable attorney’s fees, court costs, real estate commissions paid and any other costs." The second place is in the landlord's conclusion, where it prays for "all other costs associated with the collection of rents and subletting of the leased premises.” Neither of these indicates clearly and specifically that the landlord is attempting to recoup real estate commissions.