Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Centerline Investment Co. v. Tri-Cor Industries, Inc., 80 S.W.3d 499 (2002)

Citation
Centerline Investment Co. v. Tri-Cor Industries, Inc., 80 S.W.3d 499 (2002)
Parent Document
Centerline Investment Co. v. Tri-Cor Industries, Inc., 80 S.W.3d 499 (2002)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
2002-07-23

Other Sections in This Document (31)

Full Text

675 chars
Tri-Cor appeals, arguing that the court erred in three respects. First, Tri-Cor argues the court erred in awarding Cen-terline damages based on the rent for Al-cide’s former- space. Second, Tri-Cor argues that it should have been given credit for the rent Alcide paid over the amount Tri-Cor was obligated to pay. Finally, Tri-Cor argues that Centerline should not have been awarded 100% of its attorneys’ fees because much of the work the attorneys did was on aspects of the case Cen-terline should lose on appeal. Centerline cross-appeals, arguing that it was entitled to real estate commissions on the Tri-Cor lease and the reletting of the Tri-Cor premises after default.