Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Battis v. Hofmann, 832 S.W.2d 937 (1992)

Citation
Battis v. Hofmann, 832 S.W.2d 937 (1992)
Parent Document
Battis v. Hofmann, 832 S.W.2d 937 (1992)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
1992-06-16

Other Sections in This Document (38)

Full Text

294 chars
714 S.W.2d 867, 870 (Mo.App.1986). To that effect, the primary rule of statutory interpretation requires us to ascertain the intent of the legislature, considering the words employed in their plain and ordinary meaning. Union Elec. Co. v. Director of Revenue, 799 S.W.2d 78, 79 (Mo. banc 1990).