Murphy v. Century Building Co., 90 Mo. App. 621 (1901)
- Citation
- Murphy v. Century Building Co., 90 Mo. App. 621 (1901)
- Parent Document
- Murphy v. Century Building Co., 90 Mo. App. 621 (1901)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1901-12-03
Other Sections in This Document (13)
- Murphy v. Century Building Co., 90 Mo. App. 621 (1901)
- Murphy v. Century Building Co., 90 Mo. App. 621 (1901)
- Murphy v. Century Building Co., 90 Mo. App. 621 (1901)
- Murphy v. Century Building Co., 90 Mo. App. 621 (1901)
- Murphy v. Century Building Co., 90 Mo. App. 621 (1901)
- Murphy v. Century Building Co., 90 Mo. App. 621 (1901)
- Murphy v. Century Building Co., 90 Mo. App. 621 (1901)
- Murphy v. Century Building Co., 90 Mo. App. 621 (1901)
- Murphy v. Century Building Co., 90 Mo. App. 621 (1901)
- Murphy v. Century Building Co., 90 Mo. App. 621 (1901)
- Murphy v. Century Building Co., 90 Mo. App. 621 (1901)
- Murphy v. Century Building Co., 90 Mo. App. 621 (1901)
- Murphy v. Century Building Co., 90 Mo. App. 621 (1901)
Full Text
552 charsRespondent says he never saw the printed rule in question, but would have seen it had it been conspicuously posted. Whether he did or not, it could certainly have had no more force if posted than if formally expressed in a lease between him and appellant; and in such case notice to vacate must have been given to respondent. If he refused to do so, appellant could only have legally ousted him by an action. There is evidence to show respondent’s difficulties were forced on him, and that he acted in self-defense. He was entitled to his day in court.