Houston v. Columbia Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, 569 S.W.2d 211 (1978)

Citation: Houston v. Columbia Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, 569 S.W.2d 211 (1978)
Parent Document: Houston v. Columbia Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, 569 S.W.2d 211 (1978)
Jurisdiction: Missouri (state)
Effective Date: 1978-05-16
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2450794/houston-v-columbia-federal-savi... ↗

Full Text

551 chars

Having failed to find either one of the first two means of proving conversion, we turn to the third: a demand by the owner and refusal. “[I]f possession was not acquired by a tortious taking or the possessor does not appropriate or use the property in a fashion to indicate a claim thereto adverse to the owner, then no evidence of a conversion exists until there is proof, first, that a proper demand for possession was made by one who is entitled thereto and, second, that the possessor wrongfully refused delivery.” Glass v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.,

Other Sections in This Document (35)

Full Text