Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Citation
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Parent Document
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1902-02-18
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8296427/leet-v-gratz/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (42)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
- Leet v. Gratz, 92 Mo. App. 422 (1902)
Full Text
612 charsA declaration requested by the defendant, that Michael and Joseph E. Gannon, sons of Michael Gannon the testator, each took an undivided half-interest in fee in the land'in controversy under the will of said testator, and, therefore, the judgment must be for the defendant, was refused; as was one requested by the plaintiff that he was entitled to recover the full amount of the consideration paid by him for the title of *428both tbe adult and minor successful plaintiffs in tlie ejectment action, together with the amount of reasonable expenses incurred by him in defending said action. Both parties appealed.