St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- Citation
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- Parent Document
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1996-06-04
Other Sections in This Document (23)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
Full Text
462 charsMissouri follows the American Rule; that is, absent statutory authorization or contractual agreement, with few exceptions, each litigant must bear his own attorney’s fees. David Ranken, Jr. Technical Inst. v. Boykins, 816 S.W.2d 189, 193 (Mo.banc 1991). The exceptions are limited to those *512cases involving “very unusual circumstances” or where the natural and proximate result of a breach of duty is to involve the wronged party in collateral litigation. Id.