St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- Citation
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- Parent Document
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1996-06-04
Other Sections in This Document (23)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
- St. Louis County v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 507 (1996)
Full Text
1,121 charsThe Riddle court acknowledged that in cases on claims and counterclaims, generally there would be separate findings on the plaintiffs claim and on the defendant’s counterclaim embodied in a single judgment. Id. The proper form of the judgment in those types of cases is for the trial court to recite the findings and to conclude with a judgment for the party in whose favor the greater finding was made, and for the sum which represents the excess of his finding over that of his adversary. Id. The appellate court found, however, that one judgment was not appropriate in the Riddle case, because the equitable liens of the intervenor precluded the entry of one award of damages offsetting the respective awards to Riddle and Dean. Id. at 260. The intervenor’s hens were against Riddle’s interests in the property that was the subject of Riddle’s claim against Dean. Id. The court held that Riddle’s money damages, which were attributable to his loss of possession of the equipment and were subject to the intervenor’s liens, could not be offset against other damages that were not affected by the intervenor’s liens. Id.