Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Citation
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Parent Document
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1984-05-15
Other Sections in This Document (76)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
- Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265 (1984)
Full Text
614 charsIn Count I appellants also seek damages for “the difference between the amount of rent charged and paid by each plaintiff and the fair rental value of the premises in its defective condition for the term of each plaintiffs’ tenancy.” Such loss of bargain damages, if proven, result from respondent’s breach of his obligations under the lease. Appellants will be adequately compensated for the alleged damages if they prevail in Count II. We decline to undertake a full blown review of the landlord tort immunity doctrine when appellants have available to them an adequate remedy. Count I was properly dismissed. II