§ 42-3505
- Citation
- § 42-3505
- Parent Document
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 2008-02-21
Other Sections in This Document (60)
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
Full Text
570 charscircumstances the D.C. Council has deemed criminal or illicit activity incompatible with an opportunity to cure a lease violation. Neither § 42-3505.01(b) by its terms, nor related D.C. statutes, justify denying appellant the opportunity to avoid eviction by timely measures — such as exclusion of Davon Pratt from her household — to prevent recurrence of the criminal activity her son engaged in. And, as we have explained, DCHA did not here rely on lease provisions specific enough to effectuate the federal one-strike policy. Thus, unlike in Scarborough and Calloway,