§ 42-3505
- Citation
- § 42-3505
- Parent Document
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 2008-02-21
Other Sections in This Document (60)
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008)
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
- § 42-3505
Full Text
618 charsdid not apply because her lease, “unlike the lease in that case, did not incorporate the precise, no-fault language from federal regulations permitting eviction ... for dangerous criminal activity by a ‘tenant, member of the tenant’s household, or ... other person under the tenant’s control.’ ” We said that “[w]e fail to see how that omission from her lease restores a statutory right to cure,” when, “[u]nmistakably, Calloway’s lease addendum incorporated the federally required provision allowing eviction for criminal activity....” Id. (citation omitted). *661 Unlike in either of those two cases, paragraph 5 (l)