Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Citation
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Parent Document
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 2001-09-13
Other Sections in This Document (36)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
Full Text
376 chars543 A.2d at 812, but since it was not filed until almost three months after September 1, it was entirely valid. Moreover, appellants admit that they did not pay the back rent, as detailed in the notice, until September 20. Thus, even if Ms. Newsome had put the correct date (September 1) in the notice, appellants would not have corrected the violation of the lease in time. 4