Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Citation
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Parent Document
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 2001-09-13
Other Sections in This Document (36)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
- Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)
Full Text
449 charsBecause the date stated in the notice, by which they had to correct their violations of the lease or else vacate the premises, was wrong, appellants contend that the notice itself was invalid and that the complaint based on it should have been dismissed. Appellants also maintain that the notice was inadequate because it failed to “specify what actions need to be taken by the tenant to avoid an eviction,” as required by 14 DCMR § 4301.2 (1991). 3