Landise v. Mauro, 927 A.2d 1026 (2007)
- Citation
- Landise v. Mauro, 927 A.2d 1026 (2007)
- Parent Document
- Landise v. Mauro, 927 A.2d 1026 (2007)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 2007-05-31
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5143156/landise-v-mauro/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (27)
- Landise v. Mauro, 927 A.2d 1026 (2007)
- Landise v. Mauro, 927 A.2d 1026 (2007)
- Landise v. Mauro, 927 A.2d 1026 (2007)
- Landise v. Mauro, 927 A.2d 1026 (2007)
- Landise v. Mauro, 927 A.2d 1026 (2007)
- Landise v. Mauro, 927 A.2d 1026 (2007)
- Landise v. Mauro, 927 A.2d 1026 (2007)
- Landise v. Mauro, 927 A.2d 1026 (2007)
- Landise v. Mauro, 927 A.2d 1026 (2007)
- Landise v. Mauro, 927 A.2d 1026 (2007)
- Landise v. Mauro, 927 A.2d 1026 (2007)
- Landise v. Mauro, 927 A.2d 1026 (2007)
- Landise v. Mauro, 927 A.2d 1026 (2007)
- Landise v. Mauro, 927 A.2d 1026 (2007)
- Section 15-703
- Section 15-703
- Section 15-703
- Section 15-703
- Section 15-703
- Section 15-703
- Section 15-703
- Section 15-703
- Section 15-703
- Section 15-703
- Section 15-703
- Section 15-703
- Section 15-703
Full Text
476 charsKING, Senior Judge: Sarah Landise appeals from an interlocutory order directing her to deposit an *1028additional $5,000 into the court registry pursuant to D.C.Code § 15-703(b) (2001). She contends that the trial court abused its discretion in directing her to post additional security where she had prevailed at trial on the issue of liability.1 For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that the trial court’s order is not appealable at this stage of the proceedings. I.