Williamson v. St. Martin's Apartments (2020)

Citation: Williamson v. St. Martin's Apartments (2020)
Parent Document: Williamson v. St. Martin's Apartments (2020)
Jurisdiction: DC (municipal)
Effective Date: 2020-08-06
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4773213/williamson-v-st-martins-apartments/ ↗

Full Text

612 chars

6
          St. Martin’s urges affirmance of the magistrate judge’s ruling on the
ground that appellant failed to seek review by an Associate Judge within the time
period prescribed by Super. Ct. Civ. R. 73(b)(1)–(4). However, Rule 73(b) is
inapposite because denial of a jury demand is a nonappealable interlocutory order.
See Morgantown v. Royal Ins. Co., 337 U.S. 254, 258 (1949); see also Stebbins v.
Stebbins, 673 A.2d 184, 191 (D.C. 1996) (“[A] direct appeal from the resulting
judgment and a new trial, if there were error in denying the jury, will suffice.”).
                                          7

Other Sections in This Document (246)

Full Text