Williamson v. St. Martin's Apartments (2020)

Citation: Williamson v. St. Martin's Apartments (2020)
Parent Document: Williamson v. St. Martin's Apartments (2020)
Jurisdiction: DC (municipal)
Effective Date: 2020-08-06
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4773213/williamson-v-st-martins-apartments/ ↗

Full Text

878 chars

3
         At one point, Ms. Bumbray testified that the incident occurred on July 3,
2017. At another point, she testified that the incident she described happened on or
about July 6, 2017.
      4
         See 14 DCMR § 4301.4 (2020) (providing that the term “[v]iolations of an
obligation of tenancy,” which may entitle a landlord to evict a tenant if the
violations remain uncured after a thirty-day notice-to-correct has been served,
refers only to obligations contained in a valid, written lease that “are alleged to
have occurred no more than six (6) months prior to the issuance of the notice”).
      5
        The court also found that appellant was engaged in running a drug haven.
St. Martin’s had not pursued a drug-haven claim, and the parties agree that the
evidence was insufficient to support eviction on that basis.
                                           6

Other Sections in This Document (246)

Full Text