Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Golphin v. Park Monroe Associates, 353 A.2d 314 (1976)

Citation
Golphin v. Park Monroe Associates, 353 A.2d 314 (1976)
Parent Document
Golphin v. Park Monroe Associates, 353 A.2d 314 (1976)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
1976-02-24

Other Sections in This Document (93)

Full Text

380 chars
The question for us is whether on the facts of this case the defense of “retaliatory eviction” should have been permitted even though the tenant secured occupancy under a one-year lease, the term of which had expired.5 For the purpose of this review we must accept the excluded proffered testimony as establishing that this suit for possession was brought for retaliatory reasons.