Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Banks v. Eastern Savings Bank, 8 A.3d 1239 (2010)

Citation
Banks v. Eastern Savings Bank, 8 A.3d 1239 (2010)
Parent Document
Banks v. Eastern Savings Bank, 8 A.3d 1239 (2010)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
2010-12-02

Other Sections in This Document (54)

Full Text

589 chars
It is uncontested that ESB never agreed to the attempted assignment and apparently did not even learn of it until May 2007. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 24(a) states that intervention shall be permitted only where “the applicant claims an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action and the applicant is so situated that the disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede the applicant’s ability to protect that interest, unless the applicant’s interest is adequately represented by existing parties.” See, e.g., Jones v. Fon *1245 dufe,