Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Banks v. Eastern Savings Bank, 8 A.3d 1239 (2010)

Citation
Banks v. Eastern Savings Bank, 8 A.3d 1239 (2010)
Parent Document
Banks v. Eastern Savings Bank, 8 A.3d 1239 (2010)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
2010-12-02

Other Sections in This Document (54)

Full Text

822 chars
ESB commenced an action for possession of Banks’ basement unit on September 22, 2008. After a bench trial, the trial court (Judge Beck) determined that the notice to correct or vacate was not deficient in any technical respect, that it properly notified Banks of the violations of his lease, and that Banks violated the notice to correct or vacate by failing to cure the violations of the pre-foreclosure lease. Based on these findings, the trial court entered a non-redeemable judgment for possession in ESB’s favor. After unsuccessfully seeking a stay of the enforcement of the judgment pending appeal, Banks noted an appeal challenging the entry of judgment for possession. On November 5, 2008, Banks filed a notice of lis pendens with the land records in the District of Columbia. 1 In the notice *1242 of lis pendens,