Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Suggs v. Lakritz Adler Management, L.L.C., 933 A.2d 795 (2007)

Citation
Suggs v. Lakritz Adler Management, L.L.C., 933 A.2d 795 (2007)
Parent Document
Suggs v. Lakritz Adler Management, L.L.C., 933 A.2d 795 (2007)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
2007-08-16

Other Sections in This Document (60)

Full Text

502 chars
134 U.S.App.D.C. 272, 274, 414 F.2d 1168, 1170 (1969). Notwithstanding the trial court’s evidentiary ruling, some evidence relevant to the alleged housing regulation violation — although by no means complete — was presented at trial and the trial court questioned whether Suggs had the right to remain on the premises for six months with no rent payment at all, regardless of the condition of the premises, but this observation was made without the benefit of a full presentation of the relevant facts.