Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Suggs v. Lakritz Adler Management, L.L.C., 933 A.2d 795 (2007)

Citation
Suggs v. Lakritz Adler Management, L.L.C., 933 A.2d 795 (2007)
Parent Document
Suggs v. Lakritz Adler Management, L.L.C., 933 A.2d 795 (2007)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
2007-08-16

Other Sections in This Document (60)

Full Text

701 chars
Appellant Phillip Suggs (“Suggs”) leased an apartment in a building owned by ap-pellee Lakritz Adler Management, LLC (“Lakritz”). When Suggs failed to pay any rent for May or June 2005, a “Notice to Cure Violation of Tenancy or Vacate” was served on Suggs on June 23. The Notice stated that Suggs was violating “the terms and conditions of [his] tenancy” because of “[cjontinual late and delinquent payment of rent.” When Suggs continued to pay no rent, Lakritz filed a Complaint for Possession of Real Estate on September 12, 2005, setting forth as its basis “material and uncured breach of lease; possession requested; NON REDEEMABLE.” The complaint sought only possession, and not *797 back rent, 1